Labyrinth Busker journal - Brian Robert Pearce

Universe Sequences

Hi Mead! I've arranged the table below.
"As was first suggested by former professor William Thurston, when dealing with three-dimensional surfaces, there are only eight shapes that are topologically distinct."

Personally, the Poincare Conjecture is a very  difficult thing to answer because the question itself eludes the ken of most of us. But I believe the matter is a question of sequence and re-action, so this table could offer clues if  correct values are placed on the numbers 1 to 8.
Cheers
Brian 

Go to Homepage
Black Holes
The Face Of God
Are future events as real as present events?
Is life on other planets and within the Universe too fast or slow for us to recognise as life?

Is the Universe breathing?
It is my belief that the Universe responds in a sequential way that can be mimicked by applying numerical values. In essence, the Universe allocates a value to everything and would disregard anything that does not register as a value. Therefore, zero does not exist within the universal sequence. To analyse Universal sequences, it is best to apply values to everything. A sequence that can lead to nothing can not have the kind of longevity produced by the Universe.
So the question is:
What are these numerical values?
The numbers would need to resound with resonance and information if studied in an oblique way.
The problem is our present numerical system doesn't do that on a primeval way, which is the way a fundamental force would most likely employ.
It seems clear to me that one underlining dynamic of the Universe is the use of pivotal actions. There is no numerical value applied to this in our accepted order of numbers. The pivotal value needs to be halfway between the initial value and the ultimate value of completion. Zero is acceptable to us because it is easily possible to have nothing within our perception. But then we distort things by applying this idea of zero to values once they are obtained.
So we have ten (one zero). I believe the Universe would not recognise this value. Despite this imperfection, the constancy of our numerical sequencing can nonetheless glean a glimpse of the Universal sequence.
What is needed is a numerical system that has a pivotal value and more directly will resonate with the elementary sequence that the Universe employs.
So I messed around with the assumption of my old birth numbers system that insisted that everything had to be boiled down to 1 to 9. With our present numerical system, 9 implies infinity, or perpetual existence - because the resonance of multiplying the number will result in the digital conclusion amounting to the total of 9 when added together. This is impressive in sequential terms, but it's a bit like hitting the coconut and yet failing to dislodge it.
There is no pivotal value in ten. The actual result of 5 and a half is not exactly the kind of fundamental value that an overwhelming force like the creation of the Universe would employ.
But if we reduce the fundamental values to 9? Suddenly, we're in business.
The pivotal value of the Universe becomes 5.
The way to count is:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  9  10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  (our traditional system)
Now multiply each elemental digit (1 to 9) and add the digits (within the new system) for the elemental result.
Example:
1 times 6 = 6
2 times 6 = 13  ( 1 + 3 = 4) = 4
3 times 6 = 20  ( 2 + 0) = 2
4 times 6 = 26  (2 + 6) = 8

Utilising this system, this is the sequential result of the exercise:
Multiplying the value 1:  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14
Resonance value: 1 +1 +1 +1 (continuous)
Multiplying the value 2: 2 4 6 8 11 13 15 17 20
Resonance value: 2 +2 +2 +2 -6 +2 +2 +2 -6 +2 (continuous sequence)
Multiplying the value 3: 3 6 10 13 16 20 23 26 30 33 36 40
Combined digit result: 3 6 1 4 7 2 5 8 3 6 1 4
Resonance value: +3 -5 +3 +3 -5 +3 +3 -5 +3 -5 +3
Multiplying the value 4: 4 8 13 17 22 26 31 35
Resonance value: +4 -4 +4 -4 +4 -4 (continuous)
Multiplying the value 5: 5 11 16 22 27 33 38 44 50
Combined digital result: 5 2 7 4 1 6 3 8 5 2 7
Resonance value: -3 +5 -3 -3 +5 -3 -3 +5
Multiplying the value 6: 6 13 20 26 33 40 46 53
Combined digital result: 6 4 2 8 6 4 2 8 6 4 2
Resonance value: -2 -2 -2 + 6 -2 -2 -2 -2 +6 -2
Multiplying the value 7: 7 15 23 31 38 46 54
Combined digital result: 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 7 6
Resonance value: -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 +7 -1 -1
Multiplying the value 8: 8 17 26 35 44 53
Combined digital result: 8 8 8 8 8 8
Resonance value: No variation
Multiplying the value 10 ( 9 by our present valuation): 10 20 30 40 50
Resonance value: +1 +1 +1 +1 (continuous)

I would imagine that all the resonance values are continuous, but I have not had time to verify this. but now I will present the resonance values in a summarised state (rejecting resets):
ONE: +1 +1 +1 +1
TWO: +2 +2 +2 +2
THREE: +3 +3 +3 +3
FOUR: +4 -4 +4 -4
FIVE: -3 -3 -3 -3
SIX: -2 -2 -2 -2
SEVEN: -1 -1 -1 -1
EIGHT: No variation. Accepting what has occurred and applying it to the value of infinite ( as we may define it).
NINE: identical to one, except that a sequence has been passed - and another has begun.

Looking at reset values:
ONE needs -7     SEVEN needs +7
TWO needs -6    SIX needs +6
THREE needs -5 FIVE needs +5
FOUR needs +4 then -4
EIGHT never resets, nor deviates

Four becomes the pivotal value behind all that is decided, while Five is the actual numerical value that sits between One and Nine.
I do not think the Universe would recognise the term of 'infinite'. It is, after all, a way of saying, "I don't know!" I think that the terms of 'zero', 'nothing', and 'infinite' can not easily be applied to the Universe. They can easily be applied to our understanding of it, but would these words have an impact on a Universal sequence spokesman (if such a being existed).
It is curious, however, that the symbol chosen to represent 'infinity' is an 8 placed sideways.
The resonance values appear to indicate an interaction of positive and negative fields with equal influence, but the input of reset values (occurring at intervals) will add a dynamic interchange between these opposing forces.

The following quotation is not mine, but has relevance.
"The age of the universe is another, equally vexing question. Astronomers have known for some time that only two pieces of information are needed to calculate the age of the universe: the velocity at which far-off galaxies are receding from us and their distance. From the ratio of these two numbers, the Hubble constant, cosmologists can determine how fast the universe is expanding and, by extension, the age of the universe.

Until recently, most estimates of the Hubble constant were around 50, putting the age of the universe at about about 20 billion years. But recent distance measurements using the Hubble Space Telescope and the Keck telescope atop Hawaii's Mauna Kea indicate that the universe might be considerably younger--about eight to twelve billion years old.

These new estimates present considerable problems to cosmologists. Astronomers who study the chemistry and life cycles of stars calculate, with considerable confidence, that the oldest stars in the Milky Way are about 14 billion years old. Clearly, something is missing from the picture.

The age problem is only confounded by the search for missing dark matter: if Omega is equal to 1, as inflation theory requires, then the gravitational force of all that mass would tend to slow down expansion, making the universe even younger than it now appears.

Einstein may yet save the day with his ill-fated cosmological constant. Because the prevailing view in 1916 was that the universe was static, he was dismayed to find that his theory of General Relativity predicted either an expanding or contracting universe, and introduced a fudge factor to his equations to make his calculations consistent with a static universe. This "cosmological constant" represented a repulsive force of energy equal to but opposite that of gravity. Einstein later dropped the cosmological constant when Hubble showed that the universe was indeed expanding, calling it "the greatest blunder of my life."

But now Einstein's blunder is gaining some cachet within cosmological circles, because the force, if it did (or does) exist, solves the age-missing mass crisis neatly. Inflation would still occur, but there would follow a long period of very leisurely expansion, giving stars and galaxies lots of time to form. At some point, the cosmological constant would take effect, increasing the rate of expansion with its anti-gravitational force. The current rate of expansion would no longer be a reliable indicator for the pre-cosmological constant rate of expansion. However, explaining the physical basis for the cosmological constant poses yet another challenge to the theorists.

Numerical cosmologists are confronted by yet another set of variables: How should they place their estimates on the age of the universe? Should they introduce a cosmological constant? If so, what should the value be? When would it kick in?"

ONE: +1 +1 +1 +1
TWO: +2 +2 +2 +2
THREE: +3 +3 +3 +3
FOUR: +4 -4 +4 -4
FIVE: -3 -3 -3 -3
SIX: -2 -2 -2 -2
SEVEN: -1 -1 -1 -1
EIGHT: No variation. Accepting what has occurred and applying it to the value of infinite ( as we may define it).
NINE:

 ELEMENTAL UNIVERSE VALUES, THEIR SEQUENCE AND FORCES.
An example of how to interpret this table:
Each number from 1 to 8 can represent a force, element, whatever, in the universe. It is curious that man has decided there are actually only eight full status planets in the solar system as Pluto is demoted, but that is beside the point of my example. The example is breathing. Take a breath and observe the primeval sequence taking place. Your breath will last approximately 4 seconds from first intake to final deflation of the lung. In the first two seconds of the first breath (***) there is expansion, as 1 to 4 activate the values +1, +2, +3, and +4. At +4, the lung can expand no more and the lung contracts through the values of 5 to 7 (-3, -2, and -1).
You may note, however, that  it is not until 8 has been achieved that the value 4 can take on the force of its negative value (-4) - and the completion of this force occurs at 12 (our usual number system).
A remarkable thing occurs at 24** (our usual number system). The values 1 to 3 mimic the sequences that occurred at the beginning after this stage, but this time the values 4 , 5, 6 and 7  apply their negative forces onto the new 'beginning',

It is very important to see how 3 and 5 resonate:
3 = 3 6 1 4 7 2 5 8
5 = 5 2 7 4 1 6 3 8
The constant in the dynamics of this resonance is 8

If we take these numbers (1 to 8) and imagine each number represents a force within the universe, there is a strong indication that a pattern of motion is taking place
in these sequences. This becomes more evident if we play with the numbers and allow them to become other numbers (therefore another force):
The expansion of 1 is +1, which turns the value of 1 into the value of 2.
Yet 1 will continue on to become 3 and so until 8

If we take this as the original expansion of the universe we suddenly come to 1 reducing from 8 to 1.
Why is this?
In the 'beginning' 4 not only comes into being, it moves directly to expansion to form the value 8. Its subsequent action is to expand and retract as though feeding the value 8 and retreating back its own value as though seeking more food for 8.
Where does it get this 'food'?

Let us take the FIRST progression of our values and allow them to change into the resulting new value:
1 becomes 2 (1 +1)   2 becomes 4 (2 + 2)   4 becomes 8 (4 + 4)
2 becomes 4 (2+2)    4 becomes 8
3 becomes 6 (3+3)    6 becomes 4 (6 - 2)    4 becomes 8 (4 + 4)
4 becomes 8 (4 + 4)
5 becomes 2 (5 - 3)   2 becomes 4               4 becomes 8
6 becomes 4 (6 - 2)   4 becomes 8
7 becomes 6 (7 - 1)   6 becomes 4               4 becomes 8
8 becomes the cosmological constant. All other values feed it.

Hi Mead! I've been playing with those numbers and extracting sequences and seeing how values can change - and I've come to a remarkable initial assessment:
The universe is breathing.

The number 8 holds as a kind of cosmological constant in the 1 to 9 numerical system. 9 has no numerical value other than as a guide to which cycle has been reached (eg. 1c or 2c).
But, unlike zero, 9 will always have a value (1c =1  2c=2)
8 is fed by 4.
4 alternates +4 (to feed 8) then -4 to deflate fully and begin the expansion once more to feed 8.
1, 2 and 3 all represent expanding values: +1, +2, +3
So the 'beginning' may seem a bit like unbridled expansion, until 1 came across the value of 5.
5, 6 and 7 all represent deflating values: -3, -2, -1
5 ( at -3) is the most forceful deflator.
To best understand this, I suggest you imagine the 8 as a constant regulator awaiting its oxygen from its lungs. If we take 4 seconds and read each second as 'tick tock':

Tick tock Tick   tock Tick tock Tick tock
 +1   +2     +3    +4    -3    -2    -1     -4
                         -4                         +4 (8 is fed)

To see how values can become another value by implementing their integral inflator/deflator quality:
1 (+1) becomes 2 (+2) becomes 4 (+4) becomes eight
2 (+2) becomes 4 (+4) becomes eight
3 (+3) becomes 6 (-2) becomes 4 (+4) becomes eight
4 (+4) becomes eight
5 (-3) becomes 2 (+2) becomes 4 (+4) becomes eight
6 (-2) becomes 4 (+4) becomes eight
7 (-1) becomes 6 (-2) becomes 4 (+4) becomes eight

Of course each value maintains its identity, but the value changes above could represent the produce being processed by another value and made ultimately suitable for 8.

But if the universe pursues this kind of expansion and retraction it is going to be difficult to date it effectively.  Time, however, seems to be the value 1 - until you look at 7, which is the last value to appear before the constant 8. The completion of the first cycle would have induced a spiral type action as the heavier values of 5, 6 and 7 dragged and pulled the lighter values into circular motion. Once the constant 8 is achieved, the value 1 has also reached the resonance of 8. But it then retracts dramatically back to 1.
In a more spaced out manner 7 descends to 1, then dramatically expands to the constant 8 and then descends slowly (-1) again.
All this suggests that though the universe is expanding there is also retraction. It is quite likely that the speed of light is variable and it could be possible that time itself can speed up or slow down.
In fact, if time is simply temperature and resultant motion? Then it does speed up and slow down.
The constant 8 has the rule book.
Be in touch. Keep in touch.

SEQUENCE APPLICATION TO REAL EVENTS:
THE NEW ORLEANS DISASTER
Hi Mead! I suppose it's natural for accusations to fly when catastrophe occurs. I can see that the emergency agencies, striving to be prepared for the moment when this inevitable scenario would unfold, were stripped of the funding required in order to deepen the war chest in the 'battle against terrorism'. I can see the ironic twist in the oil companies' covetness being undone by the destruction of so many of their rigs and processing plants.
Art is most vital and vibrant where there are extremes. In such a way, New York led the world for a while. New Orleans and Antwerp seem to be similar in that these extremes are tempered artistically in a natural balance - and perhaps outward aggression is tempered by this and given an escape valve in ordinary times. Such a thing can inspire love for a city and a sense of security within it. But the tide of the storm has washed away the outer veneer and revealed souls of extreme nobility and souls of gangrenous nature. While the former busied themselves with the helping of others and ideas of positive attitudes, the latter allowed the seeds of hate and resentment acquired during their life experience to gain full growth.
The period of bruising is generally four days. This lends it to the sequences I was studying. It indicates that response would not seem to be dealing with the bruise until the fifth day. Even then, it would be the swelling rather than the initial source of the wound that would seem to de dealt with.
Viewing things this way, it would be unfair to criticise Bush or emergency services for response to the situation. The sequential system indicates that the response activity fulfilled an optimum classing on expectation levels. Criticism could, however, be levelled at failing to strengthen the levees and other defences in time to avert the disaster.
Be in touch. Keep in touch.
 

ARE FUTURE EVENTS AS REAL AS PRESENT EVENTS?
Hi Mead! Future events are as real as present events within the rules of the universe and physics, inasmuch as an apple falling from a tree may be only halfway through its descent - yet still it is possible to predict precisely where future events will affect it. It is possible to analyse the force of its impact when it hits the ground and the way any slope or rock or terrain will affect its bounce or impetus upon arrival - alongside the damage the apple may suffer in the process.
A strong wind or heavy rain are other inevitable forces drawn from sequential consequences - and such as these may adjust the original analysis.
But the apple's impact with the ground is a real future event yet to happen.
In such a way the universe responds automatically to inevitable forces that lead in predictable ways to future real events. The problem is there is no one on this planet able to predict precisely what that apple will do once it hits the ground, let alone more complex events (large or small).
However, the rules of the universe and future real events can be thwarted by at least one wildcard of imperfection: organic life (or equivalent beings) and the erratic, sometimes impulsive, decisions they are prone to.
If a human were to hold out his hand with a whimsical notion to catch the apple he would alter a future real event should he either catch the apple, or deflect it through a failed effort.
If he catches it the future real event of the apple does not exist anymore until the human has decided what he will do with it. It is impossible to predict the apple's future in a clinical, inevitable way.
But if the human deflects the apple in a failed attempt to catch it? Then the apple will continue its descent, but with an altered course. This altered course becomes a future real event where impact, bounce etc can once more be precisely analysed and predicted.
I think it's best to look on the universe and the wonders of nature on this planet as the props of a play. Were we able to make instant accurate analysis we may view the predictable solar system as a beautiful table fronting a marvelously impressive backdrop of ornate furniture and moody lighting on a stage. But because we are able to apply the instant clinical analysis of what is going on within the solar system (as with the apple) we are able to picture its past, present and future reality. For the audience of such advanced beings (were we so), the solar system would be as static as a table. We will know what it is, what it is doing and what it will do if left unattended.
So we will see a table and the other props - and we will become restlessly bored if the play didn't involve the entrance of actors and the unveiling of plots that would engross and compel us with suspense.
The actors are, of course, living beings and the souls within.
So... my viewpoint must be that there IS a difference between a present real event and a future real event, because a present real event has occurred... while a future real event has not yet occurred and may never occur. Until we have an understanding of how many lifeforms (large and small) there actually are in the universe I would say we can have no idea how much the universal real event can be altered.
I suppose we must hope that an actor doesn't take it in mind to smash the table.
Be in touch. Keep in touch.

The Velocity of Life
IS THERE LIFE ON TRITON AND TITAN?
CRANKY BRIAN SHOOTS (June, 2005):
Ascension onto the fifth level of belief has left me alone with distinct impressions of life and the universe that can not easily be explained, nor shared. But if you can understand that time does not exist, except as a measurement of temperature. If you can look at ice, the sea, air, gas and flame and understand that each form represents 'time' moving at a certain speed. If you can understand that size will bring its own local 'time' conditions. If you understand what I'm getting at, then maybe you will understand why Brian wants to share this journal.  The journal does not give you the answers; it gives you the questions in a personal way.
Recently I read a news report that scientists had claimed that volcanos on the planet Titan were spewing ice. If this is true, it would directly confirm my theory about temperature and life. There is potential evidence to suggest Triton is also prone to 'ice volcanoes'.
Triton, with a thick atmosphere and a mean temperature of -178C is a planet where methane and propane would be liquid. My personal view on time and temperature would predict that life on Triton is possible, but its coldness and resultant molecular slowdown would mean that that life would not be percieved easily by us as life because it will move at glacial style speed.
In turn, a Triton life form would probably not perceive a human as anything other than an extremely brief concentrate of peculiar gases. In fact, we might even appear to them as fire (flames).
A Triton life form would be likely to suffer severe, or fatal, burns if it experienced human physical contact. The human would freeze rapidly in the area of contact. The velocity of Time would adjust to a mean average in the contact zone ( rough estimate: minus 90C ). Too fast for a Triton. Too slow for a human.
However, localised temperature (time velocities) on Triton may well be able to harbour life with similar internal heat to a human. A time velocity can be any size - and it can contain an inexhaustible range of local variations.
Take this onto this planet and envision slow (glacier), becoming faster (water), becoming faster (vapour), becoming faster (gas), becoming faster (fire) - and movement from one form to another represents change (death). A life form seems reliant on a narrow band of temperature (time velocity) internally. To slow down or speed up beyond this would mean metabolism breakdown.
When we see fire, we see time speeded up to a velocity that is faster than the velocity at which our bodies can maintain their shape, function and viscosity (stickiness).
The tenacious qualities of H2o allows life on earth to experience, and survive, a wide range of time velocities.
But given the idea that life can move faster and slower than us beyond easy (or possible) perception, take another look at planet Earth and wonder how much more life (not as we know it) there actually IS right in front of our noses.